About the Journal
Focus and Scope
Educação Básica Online is an electronic scientific publication of the Education Center of the Federal University of Alagoas whose nature and purposes aim to spread, provoke, produce and use knowledge in the field of educational research in Brazil, socializing and opportunistic spaces for the development of academic excellence and scientific immersion.
The journal was created in the first half of 2025, published semiannually.
Thematic scope: International, as its themes are selected from the interest of policies, management, evaluation, planning and its relations with the nation state. As well as topics that involve and support Vocational Education in Brazil and around the world.
MISSION: Technical and Technological Cadernos Pedagógicos is an electronic journal that has as its mission, the publication and dissemination of scientific knowledge historically produced in its area of specificity, according to details of the areas of knowledge by the CNPQ:
1.00.00.00-3 Exact and Earth Sciences
2.00.00.00-6 Biological Sciences
3.00.00.00-9 Engineering
4.00.00.00-1 Health Sciences
5.00.00.00-4 Agricultural Sciences
6.00.00.00-7 Applied Social Sciences
7.00.00.00-0 Humanities
8.00.00.00-2 Linguistics, Lyrics and Arts
This journal is a member of the OJS/SEER (Electronic Journal Publishing System), as indicated by the Brazilian Institute of Information on Science and Technology and publishes peer-reviewed articles and documents.
Target audience: Although specific, Online Technical and Technological Education has as its public support: researchers, academics, students and interested in the Journal's recurring approach.
Ethics and responsibility: The articles received must have at least two positive opinions from the evaluators indicated [whether from the Councils or the ad hoc reviewers], even if they are conditional. Responsibility for the content as well as the spelling correction of the texts will be the responsibility of their authors.
The journal is organized into sections: Editorial, Presentation, Thematic Dossier, Continuous Demand Articles, Interviews and Experience Reports. Occasionally, documents and reading notes [Documents Section] are also published, dissefining collective texts prepared by related associations, as well as recent documents (laws, opinions, standards), emanating from government agencies and addressing issues of interest to the educational area.
Sources of funding: Centro de Educação - UFAL
Editing format: Open access, the Journal publishes documents online, open access in HTML format - Higher information and PDF files. Full texts.
Peer review process
The Technical and Technological Editorial of Cadernos Pedagógicos will initially carry out a first evaluation verifying compliance with the standards and the adequacy at their disposal, then refer to the opinion issue to at least two evaluators, depending on the "double-blind" method, which have competence and merit in the area for the development of the trial. If there is no consensus among reviewers, work should be forwarded to a third evaluator. At the end of the evaluation process, the authors of the final opinion issued are informed. In all cases, the confidentiality of the evaluator is guaranteed.
To the evaluators in the issuance of the opinion result choose between a) accept. (b) accept with mandatory reservations or corrections; c) reject.
In case (b), the article will be forwarded back to the reviewer who indicated the corrections and may still accept or reject it in accordance with the comments highlighted in the material submitted.
Disputes and other unforeseen cases will be reviewed by the Publishers.
Peer review
The process of selecting articles for publication occurs by evaluating their contribution to the educational area. In this sense, the guidelines of the journal, the degree of originality or originality of the research developed, and the parameters of its methodological paths are parameterized, in addition to the coherence and consistency of its overview in the unpreostability of the object. In this guideline, the process of reviewing articles is parameterized in the following stages:
- (a) Merit of form: analysis of the form under the responsibility of at least two publishers and, of a third party in case of divergence, in compliance with the criteria and standards of Cadernos Pedagógicos, being rejected in advance: (i) experience reports; (ii) revisions of literature without problems or emphasis on a contemporary problem; (iii) parts of thesis or thesis without adaptations to the criteria and standards of the Journal, iv) projects, reports or parts thereof, v) works that do not show clarity between the proposed problem and its development, vi) excessive errors of writing in Portuguese and other languages provided for by the Journal (Spanish and English), vii) works that only tangentialize or def from the field of education, (viii) only descriptive works without nucleization of the problem. (ix) works that do not follow the structure and standards of the Journal, 10) incomplete works. These documents will be sent to their authors with the initial denial notice regarding the form. If approved on the merits of the form, the second phase will be moved.
- b) Peer Review: Analysis of the merits of the article through two or more arbitrators, appointed by publishers, considering their experience (ad hoc evaluators among the lists of those registered on the Journal platform) according to the cnpq areas and the information declared on the curricular platforms of lattes. The arbitrators will be in number of two and if there is a dissent as to the merits a third party will be designated as a form of tiebreaker of the evaluation. Arbitrators can accept the item, request mandatory corrections, or reject it. In the event that the arbitrators approve the article, the arbitration decision refers to the next stage, when rejected, the arbitration decision is referred to its authors. In the case of mandatory corrections, they will only move on to the next stage if they necessarily meet the requirements of the arbitrators, conferred a posteriori when redrafting the text and reassessed. In any case, evaluation registration is requested for evaluators in written form.
- c) Review and adequacy of the work: Quando approved that the article be adapted by the team responsible to the standards and formats of Cadernos Pedagógicos, as well as, where necessary, language corrections. In cases of plutogium identification, the resource used will be Spider.
EVALUATION FORMAT
The centrality of the work is the area of Education and / or teaching ?*
Yes No
Is the object of study clearly presented?*
Yes No
Are the objectives accurately and delimited?*
Yes No
Is the methodology consistent and accurately appears in the object study?*
Yes No
Are the procedural axes of the investigation presented in the text?*
Yes No
Is there enough discussion on the subject with scientific references to support them?*
Yes No
An overview of authorship is perceived in the development of research and the corresponding construction of the text ?*
Yes No
Has any or other or no been detected in the text or parts thereof?*
Yes No
Can I publish the text?*
Yes No
Evaluator's comments or justifications
Evaluator's final opinion*
Accept rejection of mandatory corrections
To the evaluators in the issuance of the opinion result choose between: a) accept. (b) accept with mandatory reservations or corrections; c) reject.
In case (b), the article will be forwarded back to the reviewer who indicated the corrections and can still accept or reject.
Periodicity
Cadernos Pedagógicos is often semiannual, there are two numbers per year.
Free access policy
This journal offers free immediate access to its content, following the principle that making scientific knowledge available to the public for free provides greater global democratization of knowledge.
Guidelines for the organization of thematic dossiers
(1) Presentation of a dossier proposal containing a menu and justification on the relevance of the subject and the relevance to the specificity and editorial policies of the Journal;
2) Identification of the person responsible for the Thematic Dossier: full name, title, institutional affiliation, and email.
(3) The names of the articles and their authors should be included in the proposal of the Dossier, with the attention that they are not works of the same institution, and that there is no proposal for more than one article per author;
4) File submissions should be made on the user's page; containing at least 08 articles on the subject
(5) Articles composing the Dossier, as well as those of continuous demand, may not be written by master's or doctoral students, unless in co-authorship with their respective advisors and/or partner who have at least a medical degree, relevance or approximation to the specificity of the Journal;
(6) The articles of the Files shall be the subject of opinions of the ad hoc evaluators;
(7) Articles rejected as to merits and form shall not be published;
8) By submitting the article to the Dossier, the author(s) agree to the transfer of publication rights to Online Technical and Technological Education.
(9) The communications of the articles, for any purpose, indicate full knowledge of all the guidelines contained in the guidelines for the preparation of the Thematic Dossier.
10) The authors attest to the originality, originality, non-edibility, as well as the declaration of non-presentation of the material they submitted to any other Journal.
11) Articles must not exceed the number of 20 reports.
12) ABNT compliance is requested, in accordance with guidelines for authors.
Rules for publication
Articles submitted to Cadernos Pedagógicos must be a product of scientific research or experiences in Education that prove to be original, unpublished, and not presented to other journals with explicit statement by the author on such veracity.
1) Format
Texts must be generated in Word or Open Office, in the following format: a4 format paper, top and left margins of 3 cm, bottom and right of 2.0 cm, paragraph indentation (first line) of 1.0 cm; Times New Roman 12 source; 1.5 and no paging space between rows
The use of the italic function in the body of the text should be used only for foreign words. For the presentation of the elements that constitute the article use the standards of the Brazilian Association of Technical Standards (ABNT) in force:
NBR 6022, 2003 - Information and documentation - Article in periodic printed scientific publication - Presentation.
NBR 6023, 2002 - Information and documentation - References - Preparation.
NBR 6024, 2012 - Information and documentation - Progressive numbering of sections of a written document - Presentation.
NBR 6028, 2003 - Information and documentation - Summaries - Presentation.
NBR 10520, 2002 - Information and documentation - Subpoenas in documents - Presentation.
NBR 14724, 2011 - Information and documentation - Academic documents - Presentation
BRAZILIAN INSTITUTE OF GEOGRAPHY AND STATISTICS. Tabular presentation standards. 3. Ed. Rio de Janeiro, 1993.
The Editorial Committee shall reject the documents submitted that do not comply with the above-mentioned rules.
2) Structure do Article
- (a) the number of sheets of articles shall not exceed twenty (20);
- (b) the work shall have the following sequence:
On the cover:
- the title and subtitle (if any) in Portuguese, Spanish and English, (not more than 100 characters)
- The full affiliation of all authors (full name, training, position and/or function, institutional bond (institution, unit, department, place of origin), address, telephone number and email address) must appear in a supplementary document, therefore not incorporated in the article document to preserve blind peer review.
On the first page of the text you must include:
- the full title of the article in Portuguese, Spanish and English, abstract in Portuguese, summary (in Spanish) and abstract (English) of up to 150 words.
- up to five (05) keywords, keywords and keywords should be included respectively under the summary/summary/abstract, which should better reflect the content addressed in the work.
– text (introduction, development and conclusion);
– explanatory notes (if any);
- References;
– Images must be sent at a resolution of 300 dpi.
Review article
Revision texts must follow the same item structure as above.
Documents
The number of sheets should not exceed ten (10). The job must have the following sequence:
– Title;– Keywords (maximum of 03 words);– Presentation clarifying the relevance and origin of documents;– Text.
3) General filing rules
All material must be structured follows:
- (a) texts shall be sent after a rigorous spelling, grammatical and standardization review;
- (b) for quotations, it is necessary to use the author data system, in accordance with NBR 10520 (2002), with the following guidelines:
– where the author's surname is included in the sentence, it must be written only in the first capital letter, followed by the year of publication and the page of the quotation, in this case, when the direct quotation, of the respective source used.
Examples: Freire (2009, p. 7), Freire e Matos (2009, p. 7), Freire, Matos e Campos (2009, p. 7) or Freire et al. (2009, p. 7), the latter, when it is more than three authors.
In indirect quotations, the indication of the page number is optional, as shown Freire (2009) or Freire (2009, p. 7);
– where the author's surname is not included in the sentence, the author(s) and the year must be placed in parentheses.
Examples: (FREIRE, 2009, p. 7), (FREIRE; MATOS, 2009, p. 7), (FREIRE; Matos; CAMPOS, 2009, p. 7), (FREIRE et al., 2009, p. 7);
– quotations containing up to three (3) lines shall not be highlighted with indentation and shall remain with the same font of the text and in double quotation marks, indicating the font and the page consulted when it is a direct quotation;
– quotations of more than three (3) lines should be highlighted with a 4.0 cm retracement of the left margin, using the same text font, but in size ten (10), single spacing (1.0) and without double quotation marks, when direct quotation;
– quotations in foreign language should be translated into the language of the text indicating the appropriations of the translation, after the call for quotation, as an example: (Costa, 2010, p. 10, our translation);
– the end point of the quotation must arrive after the end of the sentence, before, therefore, the parentheses. Example: The scope of educational processes is broader and essential for social cohesion and the realization of people in contemporary society. (Gatti, 2013, p. 677).
- c) do not use Latin expressions (ID, ibid., op. cit. etc.) in the text, except apud (quoted by) and et al. (and others). Examples: Demonstration (2012 apud Costa, 2010, p. 10) or (Demo, 2012 apud Costa, 2010, p. 10);
- d) Whatever the type of illustration, its identification appears at the top, preceded by the designation of the word (drawing, design, flowchart, photograph, graphic, map, organization chart, plane, frame, portrait, figure, image, among others), followed by its order number of appearance in the text, in Arabic numbers, indentation and title. After the illustration, at the bottom, indicate the referenced source (required element, even if it is the production of the author himself), legend, notes and other information necessary for his understanding (if any).
Each text image (figure, illustration, photography, etc.) must also be sent via a sending system in *.jpg or *png format and with a minimum resolution of 300 dpi.
- e) equations and formulas should be highlighted in text, if necessary, numbered in parentheses, for example, x2 + y2 to z2 (1)
- (f) tables should be standardized according to the tabular presentation standards of the Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics.
- (g) notes, explanatory and sequentially numbered, should appear after the conclusion of the text, eliminating the characteristics of the footnote;
- (h) the references must contain only the authors mentioned in the work, submitted at the end of the text, in alphabetical order, in accordance with NBR 6023/2002 standards and justified only on the left. The following are examples of the most commonly used documents:
Book:
The essential elements are: author(s), title, editing, place, editor and publication date.
Freire, P. R. N. Pedagogy of the oppressed. 4. Ed. Rio de Janeiro: Peace and Earth, 1977.
In documents with more than three (03) authors: when there are more than three authors, only the first one is indicated, adding the expression et al.
Mizukami, M. G. N. et al. School and teacher learning:research and training processes. San Carlos: EdUFSCar, 2006.
Chapter of the book:
The essential elements are: Author(s), title of the piece, followed by the expression "In:", and the complete reference of the monograph in the set. At the end of the reference, you must inform paging or another way to individualize the referenced part.
Berger, P.L.; Berger, B. Socialization: how to be a member of society. In: FORACCHI, M.M.; Martins, J. S.M. (Org). Sociology and society. Sao Paulo: Technical and Scientific Books, 1994. p. 200-214.
Article:
The essential elements are: author(s), part title, article or article, title of publication, place of publication, numbering corresponding to volume and/or year, number or number, initial and final paging and year of publication.
Ferreira, C.; Alencoao, A.; Vasconcelos, C. The use of modeling in the teaching of science: a study with geological models. Science and Education,Bauru, v. 21, n. 1, p. 31-48, 2015.
Thesis:
In thesis, thesis or other academic work should indicate in a note the type of document (thesis, dissertation, completion work of the course, etc.), the degree, academic linkage, location and date of defense, mentioned in the approval sheet (if any).
Pasquali, M.B. From. Youth and participation: the meanings of the youth experience in two municipal schools of Campinas - SP. 2014. 156 f. Thesis (Master in Education) - Federal University of San Carlos, Sorocaba, 2014.
Digital document (online):
In the case of works consulted online, information about the email address, presented between the signs < >, preceded by the expression Available in: and the date of access to the document, preceded by the expression Access in:
Vallés Herrero, J.; Juste Perez, R. The functions of the social educator: validation of the CFES-R questionnaire. Bordón, Madrid, v. 67, n. 2, 2015. Available in:<http://recyt.fecyt.es/index.php/BORDON/article/view/Bordon.2015.67209>. Consultado el 17 de abril de 2015.
When used, statistical methods should be described in the detail necessary to allow access to the original data and verification of the results presented by a reader versed in the topic; at the same time, excessively technical language should be avoided and presented clearly enough to promote the understanding of a non-specialized reader. Such a request to authors requires measures such as: search, where possible, to quantify the results and present them with the corresponding indicators of measurement error or uncertainty (e.g. confidence intervals); avoid relying solely on statistical inference tests, which do not provide relevant quantitative information; discuss the eligibility of experimental units; provide detailed information on randomization and observations; discuss the reasonableness of the results and report on the possible limitations of the method used; specify the software used; restrict tables and figures to the amount necessary to explain the justification of the article and its robustness; avoid frameworks with many themes and duplication of data; statistical terms, abbreviations and symbols used in the article.
Analysis and approval of articles and other works
All works should avoid any mention of authors and delete data within text that (self-references in text and references).
Only unreleased texts are accepted. In addition, texts should not be evaluated simultaneously by another publication.
Failure to comply with this rule will result in the inability to republish in the future.
If the research carried out or the publication of the article may raise doubts about possible conflicts of interest, the author must declare in a final note that no links to funding agencies, as well as to commercial or political institutions, have been omitted. It is also worth mentioning the institution to which the author may be linked, or which has collaborated in the execution of the study, demonstrating that there are no conflicts of interest with the result presented here. It is also necessary to report that interviews and experiments with humans followed the ethical procedures established for scientific research.
All text sent to the publication is previously analyzed by the editor and, if it meets the scope of the Journal, submitted by the Editorial Board for review to at least two reviewers (peer review), which will analyze it according to the criteria defined by the Editorial Board. The article will be returned to the author(s) if the speakers suggest changes and/or corrections. In the event of a divergence of views, the text shall be forwarded to a third rapporteur for arbitration. The publication of the work involves the complete transfer of copyright to the Journal.
Partial or total reproduction of published articles and articles without subpoena from the source is not allowed.
The contents published in the texts are the responsibility of the authors, not necessarily coinciding with the point of view of the Editor or editorial board of the Journal. At the discretion of the Editorial Board, critical articles, defenses and/or comments on articles published in the journal may be accepted.
* All documents produced by the Journal must have their own DOI - Digital Object Identifier duly enabled.
Sponsors
Centro de Educação - UFAL
Sources of support
Universidade Federal de Alagoas
