Teacher decision making in teaching statistics and probability
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.28998/2175-6600.2024v16n38pe15810Keywords:
Instructional Practices, Decision making, ProbabilityAbstract
This study analyses the Instructional Practices (IP) of a Chilean teacher who teaches statistics and probability in the third year of secondary school (between 15 and 17 years old). For this purpose, the case study approach is used, since the particularity of a teacher is analysed under a qualitative methodology with an interpretative approach. The first stage consisted of recording all the classes of the unit, and then selecting 9 video vignettes with a duration of between 0:22 and 1:50 minutes framed within the interaction schemes of the IPs. A semi-structured interview was applied, for its analysis the transcripts were used using the Grounded Theory perspective, developing open, axial and selective coding. The main results show the stages that the teacher goes through to reach a decision and how each of these characteristics is transformed into an IP as an interaction between the teacher, student and content, with some of them also being a link to possible IP. However, in order to relate the interpretation and the decision, the teacher alludes to his or her professional field which is limited to the teacher's experience in establishing families of actions.
Downloads
References
Amador, J., & Lamberg, T. (2013). Learning Trajectories, Lesson Planning, Affordances, and Constraints in the Design and Enactment of Mathematics Teaching. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 15(2), 146–170. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986065.2013.770719
American Statistical Association. (2016). Guidelines for assessment and instruction in statistics education: College report. Report. https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20140325-01
Anderson, L. (2003). Classroom assessment: Enhancing the quality of teacher decision making.
Ball, D. L. (2001). Teaching, With Respect to Mathematics and Students. In Beyond Classical Pedagogy: Teaching Elementary School Mathematics (pp. 11–22).
Batanero, C., Burrill, G., & Reading, C. (2015). Teaching Statistics in School Mathematics Challenges for Teaching and Teacher Education. Statewide Agricultural Land Use Baseline 2015 (Vol. 1). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
Baumert, J., Kunter, M., Blum, W., Brunner, M., Voss, T., Jordan, A., … Tsai, Y.-M. (2010). Teachers’ Mathematical Knowledge, Cognitive Activation in the Classroom, and Student Progress. American Educational Research Journal, 47(1), 133–180. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831209345157
Blömeke, S., Busse, A., Kaiser, G., König, J., & Suhl, U. (2016). The relation between content-specific and general teacher knowledge and skills. Teaching and Teacher Education, 56, 35–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.02.003
Blömeke, S., & Delaney, S. (2012). Assessment of teacher knowledge across countries: A review of the state of research, 44, 223–247.
Blömeke, S., Gustafsson, J. E., & Shavelson, R. J. (2015). Beyond dichotomies: Competence viewed as a continuum. Zeitschrift Fur Psychologie / Journal of Psychology, 223(1), 3–13. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000194
Blömeke, S., Hoth, J., Döhrmann, M., Busse, A., Kaiser, G., & König, J. (2015). Teacher Change During Induction: Development of Beginning Primary Teachers’ Knowledge, Beliefs and Performance. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13(2), 287–308. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-015-9619-4
Boston, M., Bostic, J., Lesseig, K., & Sherman, M. (2015). A comparison of mathematics classroom observation protocols. Mathematics Teacher Educator, 3(2), 154–170. https://doi.org/10.5951/mathteaceduc.3.2.0154
Cai, J., Middleton, J. A., Schack, E. O., & Fisher, M. H. (2017). Research in Mathematics Education Teacher Noticing : Bridging and Broadening Perspectives , Contexts , and Frameworks.
Chapman, O. (2008). The challenge of mathematics teacher education in an era of mathematics education reform. In The international handbook of mathematics teacher education (pp. 115–134).
Charalambous, C. Y., & Hill, H. C. (2012). Teacher knowledge, curriculum materials, and quality of instruction: Unpacking a complex relationship. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 44(4), 443–466. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2011.650215
Clough, M. P., Berg, C. A., & Olson, J. K. (2009). Promoting effective science teacher education and science teaching: A framework for teacher decision-making. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 7(4), 821–847. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-008-9146-7
Cohen, D. K., Raudenbush, S. W., & Ball, D. L. (2003). Resources , Instruction , and Research. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 25(2), 119–142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-012-0438-6
Copur-Gencturk, Y. (2015). The Effects of Changes in Mathematical Knowledge on Teaching: A Longitudinal Study of Teachers’ Knowledge and Instruction. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 46(3), 280–330. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.46.3.0280
Darling-Hammond, L. (2000). Teacher Quality and Student Achievement : A Review of State Policy Evidence Previous Research. Education, 8(1), 1–44. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.clp
Darling-Hammond, L., Chung Wei, R., Andree, A., Richardson, N., & Orphanos, S. (2009). Professional Learning in the Learning Profession: A Status Report on Teacher Development in the United States and Abroad.
Dehoney, J. (1995). Cognitive Task Analysis: Implications for the Theory and Practice of Instructional Design. Annual National Convention of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology.
Dieterle, S., Guarino, C. M., Bargagliotti, A. E., & Mason, W. M. (2013). What Can We Learn About Effective Mathematics Teaching? Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 6(2), 164–198. https://doi.org/10.1080/19345747.2012.706695
Dunekacke, S., Jenßen, L., Eilerts, K., & Blömeke, S. (2016). Epistemological beliefs of prospective preschool teachers and their relation to knowledge, perception, and planning abilities in the field of mathematics: a process model. ZDM - Mathematics Education, 48(1–2), 125–137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-015-0711-6
Eichler, A., & Zapata-Cardona, L. (2016). Empirical Research in Statistics Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-38968-4
Estrella, S. (2017). Enseñar estadística para alfabetizar estadísticamente y desarrollar el razonamiento estadístico. Alternativas Pedagógicas Para La Educación Matemática Del Siglo XXI, 173–194.
Gallagher, H. A. (2016). Professional Development To Support Instructional Improvement : Lessons from Research, 1–9.
Garfield, J., & Ben-Zvi, D. (2008). Research on Teaching and Learning Statistics. Developing Students’ Statistical Reasoning, 21–45.
Gonzalez, O. (2016). A Framework for Assessing Statistical Knowledge for Teaching Based on the Identifi cation of Conceptions of Variability Held by Teachers. In D. Ben-Zvi & K. Makar (Eds.), Teaching and Learning of Statistics (pp. 315–326). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12688-3
Gonzalez, O. (2017). Secondary School Mathematics Teachers’ Conceptions on Data-Based Decision-Making: Insights from Four Japanese Cases. Teaching and Learning in Maths Classrooms, 37–47. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49232-2
Jon, R., Lynch, K., Perova, N., Jacobs, V. R., Philipp, R. A., York, N., & Link, C. (2013). Using video to improve mathematics ’ teachers ’ abilities to attend to classroom features : A replication study The Harvard community has made this article openly available . Please share how this access benefits you . Your story matters . Citation Access.
Kaiser, G., Blömeke, S., König, J., Busse, A., Döhrmann, M., Hoth, J., & Kaiser, G. (2017). Professional competencies of ( prospective ) mathematics teachers — cognitive versus situated approaches. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 161–182. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-016-9713-8
Klein, G., & Hoffman, R. (1992). Seeing the invisible: Perceptual-cognitive aspects of expertise. Cognitive Science Foundations of Instruction. Retrieved from http://cmapsinternal.ihmc.us/rid=1217527241618_235135118_3994/Seeing the Invisible-1992.pdf
König, J. (2015). Measuring classroom management expertise (CME) of teachers: A video-based assessment approach and statistical results. Cogent Education, 2(1), 991178. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2014.991178
König, J., Blömeke, S., & Kaiser, G. (2015). Early Career Mathematics Teachers’ General Pedagogical Knowledge and Skills: Do Teacher Education, Teaching Experience, and Working Conditions Make a Difference? International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13(2), 331–350. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-015-9618-5
Lembke, E. S., Hampton, D., & Beyers, S. J. (2012). RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION INMATHEMATICS: CRITICAL ELEMENTS. Revista de Educacion, 49(3), 257–272. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits
Mason, J. (2016). Perception, interpretation and decision making: understanding gaps between competence and performance—a commentary. ZDM - Mathematics Education, 48(1–2), 219–226. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-016-0764-1
Munter, C. (2014). Developing Visions of High-Quality Mathematics Instruction. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education (Vol. 45). https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.45.5.0584
Ottmar, E. R., Rimm-Kaufman, S. E., Larsen, R. A., & Berry, R. Q. (2015). Mathematical Knowledge for Teaching, Standards-Based Mathematics Teaching Practices, and Student Achievement in the Context of the Responsive Classroom Approach. American Educational Research Journal, 52(4), 787–821. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831215579484
Rasmussen, J. (2014). Teacher expertise. International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, 15459–15465.
Sabers, D. S., Cushing, K. S., & Berliner, D. C. (2017). Differences among Teachers in a Task Characterized by Simultaneity , Multidimensionality , and Immediacy, 28(1), 63–88.
Santagata, R., & Yeh, C. (2016). The role of perception, interpretation, and decision making in the development of beginning teachers’ competence. ZDM - Mathematics Education, 48(1–2), 153–165. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-015-0737-9
Sherin, M. G., Jacobs, V. R., & Philipp, R. A. (2011). Teacher Noticing Seeing Trouugh Teachers’ Eyes.
Simons, H. (2011). El estudio de caso: Teoría y práctica. Madrid. Retrieved from http://books.google.es/books/about/Bases_de_la_investigaci?n_cualitativa.html?id=TmgvTb4tiR8C&pgis=1
Stahnke, R., Schueler, S., & Roesken-Winter, B. (2016). Teachers’ perception, interpretation, and decision-making: a systematic review of empirical mathematics education research. ZDM - Mathematics Education, 48(1–2), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-016-0775-y
Stein, M. K., Engle, R. A., Margaret, S., & Hughes, E. K. (2013). Orchestrating Productive Mathematical Discussions : Five Practices for Helping Teachers Move Beyond Show and Tell. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, (September), 313–340.
Stein, M. K., & Smith, M. S. (2011). 5 practices for Orchestrating productive mathematics discussions.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (2002). Bases de la investigación cualitativa: técnicas y procedimientos para desarrollar la teoría fundamentada. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452230153
Taylor, S., & Bogdan, R. (1998). Introducción a los métodos cualitativos en investigación. Introducción a Los Métodos Cualitativos de Investigación, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
Teppo, A. (2015). Grounded theory methods. In Approaches to qualitative research in mathematics education: examples of methodology and methods (pp. 3–21). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1080/14794802.2015.1092392
Van Es, E. A., & Sherin, M. G. (2002). Learning to Notice: Scaffolding New Teachers’ Interpretations of Classroom Interactions LEARNING TO NOTICE IN THE CONTEXT OF REFORM. Jl. of Technology and Teacher Education, 10(4), 571–596.
Van Es, E. A., & Sherin, M. G. (2008). Mathematics teachers’ “learning to notice” in the context of a video club. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(2), 244–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TATE.2006.11.005
Vollstedt, M. (2015). To see the wood for the trees: The development of theory from empirical interview data using grounded theory. Approaches to Qualitative Research in Mathematics Education, 23–48. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9181-6
Wilson, P. H., Sztajn, P., Edgington, C., & Myers, M. (2015). Teachers’ Uses of a Learning Trajectory in Student-Centered Instructional Practices. Journal of Teacher Education, 66(3), 227–244. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487115574104
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Debates em Educação
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Neste tipo de licença é permitido Compartilhar (copiar e redistribuir o material em qualquer suporte ou formato) e Adaptar (remixar, transformar, e criar a partir do material). Deverá ser dado o crédito apropriado , prover um link para a licença e indicar se mudanças foram feitas . O conteúdo não pdoerá ser utilizado para fins comerciais .
Atribuição-NãoComercial 4.0 Internacional Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY-NC 4.0).
