A manifestação do “Prêmio de Beleza” na área de Ensino
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.28998/2175-6600.2020v12n27p200-213Keywords:
Prêmio de Beleza. Avaliação de professoresAbstract
Neste artigo, busca-se investigar se existe relação entre a beleza dos professores e a avaliação docente realizada pelos alunos, atribuindo vantagens aos professores percebidos como mais atrativos. Por meio de uma revisão de literatura, foram analisadas publicações que tratam do tema, buscando identificar se existe manifestação do “prêmio de beleza” em sala de aula e se ocorre maior incidência para um determinado gênero. Os resultados demonstraram que o nível de atratividade percebido nos professores impacta significativamente nas avaliações de ensino. Além disso, os artigos estudados revelam que,de modo geral, há maior incidência do “prêmio de beleza” para os homens, tendo as professoras mulheres recebido avaliações significativamente menores.
Downloads
References
ANDREONI, J.; PETRIE, R. Beauty, gender and stereotypes: Evidence from laboratory experiments. Journal of Economic Psychology, v. 29, n. 1, p. 73–93, fev. 2008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2007.07.008
BERGGREN, N.; JORDAHL, H.; POUTVAARA, P. The looks of a winner: Beauty and electoral success. Journal of Public Economics, v. 94, n. 1–2, p. 8–15, fev. 2010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2009.11.002
BIDDLE, J. E.; HAMERMESH, D. S. Beauty, Productivity, and Discrimination: Lawyers’ Looks and Lucre. Journal of Labor Economics, v. 16, n. 1, p. 172–201, jan. 1998. https://doi.org/10.1086/209886
BORLAND, J.; LEIGH, A. Unpacking the beauty premium: What channels does it operate through, and has it changed over time? Economic Record, v. 90, n. 288, p. 17–32, dez. 2014. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-4932.12091
DERYUGINA, T.; SHURCHKOV, O. Does beauty matter in undergraduate education? Economic Inquiry, v. 53, n. 2, 940–961, out. 2015a. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecin.12152
DERYUGINA, T.; SHURCHKOV, O. (2015b). Now you see it, now you don’t: The vanishing beauty premium. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, v. 116, p. 331–345, ago. 2015b. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2015.05.007
DOORLEY, K., SIERMINSKA, E. Myth or fact? The beauty premium across the wage distribution in Germany. Economics Letters, v. 129, p. 29–34, abr. 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2015.01.033
EAGLY, A. H.; ASHMORE, R. D.; MAKHIHANI, M. G.; LONGON, L. C. What is beautiful is good, but...: A meta-analytic review of research on the physical attractiveness stereotype. Psychological Bulletin, v. 110, n. 1, p. 109–128, 1991. Retrieved from www.apa.org/pubs/journals/bul/
FEINGOLD, A. Good-looking people are not what we think. Psychological Bulletin, v. 111, n. 2, 304–341, mar. 1992. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.111.2.304
HAMERMESH, D. S.; ABREVAYA, J. Beauty is the promise of happiness? European Economic Review, v. 64, p. 351–368, nov. 2013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2013.09.005
HAMERMESH, D. S., BIDDLE, J. E. Nber Working Paper Series Beauty and the Labour Market, n. 4518, nov. 1993.
HAMERMESH, D. S.; PARKER, A. Beauty in the classroom: Instructors’ pulchritude and putative pedagogical productivity. Economics of Education Review, v. 24, n. 4, p. 369–376, ago. 2005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2004.07.013
JOHNSON, N. D.; MISLIN, A. A. Trust games: A meta-analysis. Journal of Economic Psychology, v. 32, n. 5, p. 865–889, oct. 2011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2011.05.007
KALICK, S. M.; ZEBROWITZ, L. A., LANGLOIS, J. H.; JOHNSON, R. M. Does human facial attractiveness honestly advertise health? longitudinal data on an evolutionary question. Psychological Science, v. 9, n. 1, p. 8–13, jan. 1998. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00002
KANAZAWA, S.; KOVAR, J. L. Why beautiful people are more intelligent. Intelligence, v. 32, n. 3, p. 227–243, may 2004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2004.03.003
LANGLOIS, J. H.; KALAKANIS, L.; RUBENSTEIN, a J.; LARSON, A.; HALLAM, M.; SMOOT, M. Maxims or myths of beauty? A meta-analytic and theoretical review. Psychological Bulletin, v. 126, n. 3, p. 390–423, may 2000. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.126.3.390
LANGLOIS, J. H.; RITTER, J. M.; ROGGMAN; L. A., VAUGHN, L. S. Facial Diversity and Infant Preferences for Attractive Faces. Developmental Psychology, v. 27, n. 1), p. 79–84, 1991. disponível em: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.319.5468&rep=rep1&type=pdf
MENDEZ, J. M.; MENDEZ, J. P. Student inferences based on facial appearance. Higher Education, v. 71, n. 1, p. 1–19, jan. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-015-9885-7
MOBIUS, M. M.; ROSENBLAT, T. S. Why Beauty Matters. American Economic Review, p. 222–235, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14443
PARRETT, M. Beauty and the feast: Examining the effect of beauty on earnings using restaurant tipping data. Journal of Economic Psychology, v. 49, p. 34–46, aug. 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2015.04.002
PONZO, M.; SCOPPA, V. Professors’ beauty, ability, and teaching evaluations in italy. B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis and Policy, v. 13, n. 2, p. 811–835, ago. 2013. https://doi.org/10.1515/bejeap-2012-0041
RUFFLE, B. J.; SHUTUDINER, Z. Are Good-Looking People More Employable? Management Science, v. 61, n. 8, p. 1760–1776, may 2014. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2014.1927
SALA, E.; TERRANEO, M.; LUCCHINI, M.; KNIES, G. Exploring the impact of male and female facial attractiveness on occupational prestige. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, v. 31, n. 1, p. 69–81, mar. 2013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rssm.2012.10.003
Süssmuth, B. Beauty in the classroom: are German students less blinded? Putative pedagogical productivity due to professors’ pulchritude: peculiar or pervasive? Applied Economics, v. 38, n. 2, p. 231–238, sep. 2006. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036840500390296
TODOROV, A.; PAKRASHI, M.; OOSTERHOF, N. N. Evaluating Faces on Trustworthiness After Minimal Time Exposure. Social Cognition, v. 27, n. 6, p. 813–833, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2009.27.6.813
WILSON, R. K.; ECKEL, C. C. Judging a Book by its Cover: Beauty and Expectations in the Trust Game. Political Research Quarterly, v. 59, n. 2, p. 189–202, jun. 2006. https://doi.org/10.1177/106591290605900202
WOLBRING, T.; RIORDAN, P. How beauty works. Theoretical mechanisms and two empirical applications on students’ evaluation of teaching. Social Science Research, v. 57, p. 253–272, maio 2016.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2015.12.009
WONG, J. S.; PENNER, A. M. Gender and the returns to attractiveness. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, v. 44, p. 113–123, jun. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rssm.2016.04.002
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Neste tipo de licença é permitido Compartilhar (copiar e redistribuir o material em qualquer suporte ou formato) e Adaptar (remixar, transformar, e criar a partir do material). Deverá ser dado o crédito apropriado , prover um link para a licença e indicar se mudanças foram feitas . O conteúdo não pdoerá ser utilizado para fins comerciais .
Atribuição-NãoComercial 4.0 Internacional Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY-NC 4.0).
